Oliver Pereira wrote:
I think that without playing word games, the licence is asking us to list the individual responsible.
But we do. The GNU FDL contains no prohibition on pseudonyms, and if someone chooses to edit under the pseudonym 129.79.1.xxx, then we let them do so.
I do agree, though, that at some point we will want to have a "sifter" project or similar in order to create a Wikipedia release version 1.0.
That sounds an interesting idea. But who would be responsible for determining what gets into the released version? Would it be some sort of... cabal? ;)
That's a good question.
--Jimbo