Ray Saintonge wrote:
I am annoyed by the behaviour of user:fire. He is not a sysop on Wikisource, yet he was able to come and block a user indefinitely with no better excuse than a non-working link to wikipedia about name-change policy. I immediately reversed the block. Those who participate in Wikisource are quite capable of deciding who should be blocked. We don't need this loose cannon who has not otherwise participated in Wikisource to sneakily acquire some kind of superior access for no other reason to block a user that he does not like.
Ec
Hello Ray,
I was doing username changes requested on this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Changing_username
There was also a user, 'Spik dk', who asked to get his username changed. That's what I did. The instructions say also, that I have to move the User: and the User Talk: Page from the old to the new nick. For security reasons ("This prevents a new user claiming the name, which would mean the signatures and author attributions made by third party users of our content would all be pointing to the wrong person."), there's also an instruction to block the old username.
After changing the username(s) in the database, I asked Angela to get temp sys-op on the Wikis were I had changed the usernames of the people who requested to block the old nicks. http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_permissions/Archive1
So: I was not blocking the user because I "don't like him" ( I even don't know him :) ), but because he asked for a username change and (following the instructions) it also included to block the old username :)
Yours, Fire