On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 1:12 PM, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
That's what the IWF's been consistently asserting to the press, that's what their rep said on Radio 4 Today when I was on and that's what many journalists have said to me that the IWF said to them. Given this, I feel confident in stating that the IWF really believe that they are required to block the page the image is on.
Do they believe it is a technical limitation (it's not, if they think this we need to educate them harder) or that its their purpose?
If the latter, how do we get that better featured in the media... I think it's outrageous.