Fred Bauder wrote:
Khendon wrote:
I'm not convinced it works that way, inexperienced wikipedian that I am. Speaking personally, if I notice a "full" link then I'll likely as not pass over it. If I notice an "empty" link then I'm much more likely to consider whether I could write an article on the subject.
I would say it is a good habit to check out articles on subjects of interest. Especially in areas of expertise.
When I started out with Wikipedia, that's just what I did. It quickly became unworkable -- I guess that I have too much expertise.
I always thought that orange for tiny stubs proposal was ugly, but to be honest, I would probably follow those links most readily.
-- Toby