Pablo Saratxaga wrote:
If there is a real will to write an encyclopedia, then it should be accepted, whatever the language; but if there isn't a will to write an encyclopedia of human knowledge, then it shouldn't (and I insist on *human* knowledge; while an encyclopedia on the world of the Middle Earth would be a very nice project, it doesn't fit Wikipedia).
As I tried to indicate earlier, even that concern should take a back seat to whether there's a need for an encyclopedia in a given language from the reader's perspective. What makes Wikipedia work isn't so much the writers, but the readers -- because the readers BECOME the writers when they realize that something they want to find in Wikipedia isn't there, or isn't complete.
That's how I got started in editing Wikipedia: I looked up information about a dinosaur, out of idle curiosity, and saw that it didn't yet exist. I ended up creating the article in English because that's the language in which I was looking for the information. How many people will be able to say that about Quenya? I think it's telling that the first we heard about a Quenya Wikipedia was someone who has been sitting around accumulating self-written articles, and not someone that said "Hey, I was looking for an article about such-and-such in this language, but there's no listing for the language. Can we fix this?"
Nobody's going to put much effort into writing encyclopedia articles (for very long) that nobody's reading.
-- Chad