At 09:57 PM 9/23/02 -0700, you wrote:
Of course, I still argue that that 95+% of encyclopedia topics objectively can't be covered even as minimal articles with fewer than 500 characters. I would further argue that it is not possible to have a decent definition
using
fewer than 100 characters, but that is a different thread....
-- Daniel Mayer (aka mav)
I would suggest the opposite. Perhaps 5% of the hundred million or so possible entries would justify an article of more than 500 characters. That still leaves 500,000 potential articles of more than 500 characters.
Fred