Erik Moeller wrote:
This is a bit of a philosophical question. IMHO sections should not be as short as they are in the Donau-Ries article. The text is only 6400 bytes, yet there are 11 sections, that's 580 bytes per section.
You are of course right. I created these sections for testing purposes only. The original article has less sections.
With longer sections, you don't want the [edit] link to load all the text within that section and subsections, because you'll have the same problem as before: too large blocks of text.
You are probably right.
Mirko (Cordyph)