Jonathan Walther wrote:
The issue is that people with certain biases do whatever they want, and when someone tries to deal with them, the person trying to correct the bias is the one that either gets shouted down, and leaves the Wikipedia voluntarily, or finally gets banned by Jimmy. So the bias stays in and gets worse and worse.
I understand that this is what you think happened in your case, so we don't need to discuss that right now. But perhaps you can point to other cases to illustrate your point more generally?
The Judeocentrism article, for instance, is worded to give the impression that if you believe there is such a thing, you are a frothing at the mouth Jew hater.
This is just simply not true. There is absolutely nothing in the article that even hints at such an impression.
I was banned for trying to keep the article in existance through peaceful and polite persistence.
And this is *particularly* untrue.
--Jimbo