----- Original Message ----- From: "Sj" 2.718281828@gmail.com To: wikipedia-l@wikimedia.org Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 10:46 AM Subject: Re: [Wikipedia-l] Wikipedia is a general encyclopedia
Much of what apogr wrote is beyond me,
refer to dictionary.talk in en.wiki
but I was moved by this distillation of
key problems:
The problems, as I see them, include a) uneven use of "scale" b) no check for completeness on a particular level
I find these to be pervasive problems, both for WP as a whole (in creating projects, defining category-sets, identifying key subject areas), for each of its subprojects (in creating article-lists, identifying goals of equal importance, covering an entire topic), and for each individual article (in balancing detail across aspects of an article, maintaining consistent perspective, and maintaining a connection
with
other articles at higher and lower levels of detail).
+sj+
b) it is a semi-finished colouring book with clolours of uneven
intensity
c) it is a number of diligent tube-sighted people caught in the process
of
lace-making
ps - these gems should surely go on the list of [[what wikipedia is]]...
_ _ :-------.-.--------.--.--------.-.--------.--.--------[...] _______________________________________________ Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l