Not being fluent in Low Saxon or Dutch (I never claimed I was), I cannot read what you said and know the meaning with complete accuracy.
But I get the idea that you're saying that you think that this discussion should be in Dutch and Low Saxon, at least in the second sentence.
I honestly have to disagree with this. It should either be in any language, as policy says, or in Low Saxon exclusively. There's no reason why it should be in Dutch *and* Low Saxon.
---
Obviously, Walter's message was not directed at me, but I can understand it better than Kasper's.
"Ja Guaka die Node EU zegt alle talen te spreken dus dan begrijpt ie dit ook wel. Anyway kan je het NDS-NL ook steunen met je stem?"
I don't recall ever having said that I speak these languages. Please kindly find me a quote where I do. And, it's "node ue" or just "node", not "node eu".
Mark
guaka@no-log.org wrote:
Servien, at this point you have gone beyond even a distortion of reality to pure fantasy. Speech varieties cannot develop separately if they're spoken 4km apart from one another (an example I gave earlier in the thread), unless there's a huge geographical barrier between them.
Mark, het wordt nu wel erg irritant en ik denk dat je het toch aan
mensen over moet
laten die wel weten waar ze het over hebben.
Misschien dat deze discussie gewoon in het Nederlands en nds (en een
klein beetje
Duits) moet worden gevoerd.
Mark
On 03/07/05, guaka@no-log.org guaka@no-log.org wrote:
Servien, at this point you have gone beyond even a distortion of reality to pure fantasy. Speech varieties cannot develop separately if they're spoken 4km apart from one another (an example I gave earlier in the thread), unless there's a huge geographical barrier between them.
Mark, het wordt nu wel erg irritant en ik denk dat je het toch aan mensen over moet laten die wel weten waar ze het over hebben.
Misschien dat deze discussie gewoon in het Nederlands en nds (en een klein beetje Duits) moet worden gevoerd.