"AT" == Alex T alex756@nyc.rr.com writes:
AT> This brings up an interesting point regarding copyright. If AT> the content is so generic as just to be knowledge then it is AT> not really copyrightable as it would fall in the public AT> domain.
That's absolutely 100% not true. Copyright is on expression of facts, not facts themselves.
You need to read up on [[:en:copyright]], bub.
~ESP