Karen AKA Kajikit wrote:
We could then have both "Random article" and "Random entry".
That sounds better to me... I use the random button as a means of finding double redirects, year templates without any content, pathetic stubs, spelling mistakes that need correcting etc. If all of these were cut out, its usefulness to me would be slashed. When I come to a lengthy page with the random button I just move on, because I assume that the article doesn't need my sort of work on it anymore.
I am all for keeping the stubs in the "random article", or for creating a second function (or maybe make that a user preference...). Just be advised that you can find stubs with the "short pages" special page, and double redirects with a database query you can find on "wikipedia:Database queries".