On 1/29/06, Finne Boonen finne@cassia.be wrote:
what you're talking about is slightly dangerous, en: has been known to be incorrect quite often :)
:)) This is the part of collaborative wiki process. If English Wikipedia fails when bot pass the first time, the second or the third will be correct. I am not talking about completely automatic process, but about a team who would work on this issue. Also, if we are able to make something similar based on German Wikipedia, it would be good, too.
on another note, this idea is better implementend in the wikidata idea, but by heart I don't know where info on that lives.
Pure data about something are better then nothing :) Also, pure data are encyclopedic, too. Also, this just should be the beginning of the article (people should continue to work on such article); as well as at the beginning of the project. It is possible to find keywords from some article and generate a number of sentences with a lot of sense.