Dear Mark,
I certainly do not believe that I am right and everybody else is wrong... well, I do, but it is an opinion easily changed by solid evidence -- Boris did a very good job of presenting real evidence, and convinced me partially. I still haven't been able to sort out: 1.Differences caused by the use of Patentplatt,
We are still talking about nds/Katt. And you are still accusing us of using "Patentplatt", a pejorative word for "deficient Platt". Please have a look at http://nds.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Katt&diff=21810&oldid=185... This is a diff between the last version before the anonymous changes (by Ron) and the end of his edits.
Almost all of them involve spelling. In a few cases a different word was proposed, where usually both words are acceptable for different people. The only real improvement is the last paragraph under "biology". Here the overall structure has improved a bit and the point in the last sentence was made clearer.
So in short: this does not at all allow anyone to describe the whole article before to be "deficient Platt". And frankly I cannot stand that accusation any longer.
Regards,
Heiko Evermann