At 2002-09-03 15:38 +0100, tarquin wrote:
Sudden influx of pages on bondage today: bondage magazine bondage photographer bondage artist
Yes, yes, I know, wikipedia is *wide*, wikipedia is *all-inclusive*, wikipedia has room for everyone and everything. Even so, I am feel mysteriously tempted to start writing a slew of articles on the fine art of picking one's nose.
When ours is a movement of volunteers we can expect people to have more knowledge about whatever interests them. I like computers and was therefore interested in electronics, because that enables them.
You may like nose picking or something else I'm not interested in, but why deny the people with a less fortunate childhood to talk about their sex-therapies?
I'm in Europe, let me guess: You're in the USA.
And by the way, the manner in which the Western society through the christian church has interpreted the biological tendency of men and women to bind is very bondage-like. I think it's only natural for people who live more in the flesh then the mind, to act out the process of binding/bondage.
What's wrong with that?
Greetings, Jaap