Why do you have to vote based on what they said?
Of course, it's all political drivel. I voted based on the fact that I know these people. I voted for the ones I trust most with such a position.
Mark
On 29/06/05, Craig Franklin craig@halo-17.net wrote:
Scríobh Mark Williamson:
I would discourage this. Unless you really don't have an opinion, why not vote for your preferred candidates? If you don't have a preference and you don't like any of them, I can understand.
But I do have an opinion. The positions of all the candidates seem to be essentially identical, "we love Wikipedia and NPOV". I see no dramatic proposals on the topics of copyright, promotion, hardware or managing growth. The candidates all propose to increase community input to the board, but don't say exactly how they will do this. They all talk about guiding the board, but offer no suggestions as to what direction they will guide it in. Nobody, in particular, has expressed an opinion on the Chinese Wikinews issue.
In summary, I voted blank.
Sláinte,
- Craig
Craig Franklin PO Box 764 Ashgrove, Q, 4060 Australia http://www.halo-17.net - Australia's Favourite Source of Indie Music, Art, and Culture.
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l