Sorry if this is a doublepost...
In article 87hdzz47r1.fsf@unicorn.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us, Evan Prodromou evan-+DxIcwYt55H9qxiX1TGQuw@public.gmane.org wrote:
"JW" == Jimmy Wales
jwales-KK9S75Hv+MAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
writes:
JW> But I have this counter-thought -- while I do agree that the JW> idea of 1.0 has been causing people to do some things that I JW> don't really think are best, I think the solution to this is JW> to hurry up and actually implement a plan/software/whatever to JW> permit those who have deletionist tendencies (no insult meant JW> by the term!) to work on that.
I wonder if there's a way to use fields metadata:
http://meta.wikipedia.org/wiki/Field-value_pairs
...to start tagging articles for 1.0. Say, "[[release=1.0]]" or something.
~ESP
Cosider this my voice of support. Or this:
http://meta.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Field-value_pairs
Peter
(P.S. Please consider this a shameless plug for a conversation and not an even more shameless 'me too' post.)