Andre Engels wrote:
The largest practical obstacle being that de GNU/FDL republication forbids under another or no license, whether it's stricter, less strict, or even effectively the same.
Right. At very best, the dual-licensing scheme could only be applied to *new* articles, or articles that contain *no* GNU/FDL content, which is pretty hard to determine at this point. I'm skeptical as to whether this is possible.
I guess if we wanted to do something like this, we'd have to find a license that solves some really important problem. I don't know what the Creative Commons license here is supposed to have as an advantage.
--Jimbo