He's back with another, similar IP. Now [[2003]] already contains:
* [[2003 in film]] * [[2003 in literature]] * [[2003 in music]] * [[2003 in sports]] * [[2003 in television]]
IMHO this is *way* too far out.
I left him a note at Talk:List of musical events http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_musical_events, lacking a better place. Someone please make him stop, before we have to clean up all year entries again.
Magnus
Zoe wrote:
I didn't care for it from the beginning, especially since it seems to be solely dedicated to The Year in Rock Music, and all other genres are ignored. Also, I don't like that he's predicting the future with "2003 in music", etc.
Zoe
*/rose.parks@att.net/* wrote:
Hi, Having finally checked the Recent Changes last night and read some of the "Year XXXX in music" articles, I agree with Mr. Manske. I think this is not a good idea and foresee this followed by "Year XXXX in painting," "Year XXXX in dance," "Year XXXX in literature." Further, the articles are rather summary, listing publication of songs, performers' highpoints, deaths etc. I would think this information will be incorporated in Wikipedia in some other form eventually, if it isn't already. For me. it is hard to find much meaning in these entries, as events appear out of context. For this reason, I think we should consider whether this is a good idea, before it goes much further. As Ever, Ruth Ifcher -- > Someone's creating articles like "1974 in music".Can't that just go > under [[1974]]? > > Ma! gnus > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikipedia-l mailing list > Wikipedia-l@wikipedia.org > http://www.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l _______________________________________________ Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@wikipedia.org http://www.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus http://rd.yahoo.com/mail/mailsig/*http://mailplus.yahoo.com - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now http://rd.yahoo.com/mail/mailsig/*http://mailplus.yahoo.com