David Gerard wrote:
Anonymous or new-editor edits will need to be approved by a logged-in editor.
I am sure that no matter what some percentage of the people reading this will misinterpret it, but it might be a bit clearer to _start_ with the word "edits" and explain what "approval" entails; "The edits of anonymous or newly-signed-up editors will need to be approved by an editor who's already been on Wikipedia for a while before they'll be shown to other readers."
Jimmy Wales asked for a time-delay feature for casual readers in late 2004; after very fast editing on the Indian Ocean tsunami produced a very high-quality article (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_Indian_Ocean_earthquake) very quickly, but with some highly visible vandalism; we've hotly discussed how to achieve stable high-quality editions of Wikipedia since almost the start of the project, in 2001.
I like semicolons but there are too many in this paragraph. The first should be a comma, the second a period IMO. And the last comma shouldn't be there at all.