Agreed. But then, at least according to *some* of us, since I am not a Wikisourcian, my opinion does not matter.
--node
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 02:52:46 -0700, Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net wrote:
Magnus Manske wrote:
Angela wrote:
If such pages would need permanent protection, it only proves they are not suitable for a wiki, where pages are supposed to be edited.
The point seems to be that pi is *not* supposed to be edited. An article *about* pi is. Wikisource should make it easy to add a data page, but then keep it stable, IMHO.
Agreed. I tend to look at Wikisource as a place where material is relatively much less editable than onWikipedia, but not completely uneditable. This mostly works. But that could be because some of the texts are so long that they discourage editing. There are features that I would love to have that would make translations and annotations more convenient, but I can be patient in waiting for them. 8-)
Ec
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l