--- Daniel Mayer maveric149@yahoo.com wrote:
Lee Pilich wrote:
... This is perhaps a little off-topic, but is there a quick and easy explanation of why the Wikipedia is released under the GFDL and not into the public domain? Somebody asked me the other day, and I realised that I didn't actually know.
So that Britannica, Encarta or another proprietary encyclopedia doesn't cannibalize the project by incorporating our material and not making their modifications available under a free license. That would break the chain of positive feedback that has gotten us so far.
...or so the story goes. EB could in fact take Wikipedia, make some improvements (or not), and slap an invariant section on every article, such as "Improvements by Encyclopedia Britannica (tm), the best encyclopedia in the world, available from www.eb.com."
Axel
Who would read or continue to contribute to Wikipedia if a proprietary version was always snatching up the best parts? I wouldn't - what would be the point? Any time we do something better than a proprietary encyclopedia all they have to do is copy what we did. Then there is a proprietary fork. Forks are bad and proprietary ones are really bad because they tend to tear appart the non-proprietary communities. We would never be able to rise above the
proprietary crowd in quality and contributors will drift away. We would never be able to beat Britannica because we would be assimilated into Britannica, piece by piece.
Short answer: The GNU FDL encourages people to share and discourages people to be selfish.
-- Daniel Mayer (aka mav) _______________________________________________ Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@wikipedia.org http://www.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com