Looking at current practice, there are several alternatives that may occur: I. The most persistent win Ia. the most highly skilled at WP dispute resolution win. II. The parties continue to compromise until all agree on a bland version III. One side starts a page from a different aspect (I almost said different POV) or on a subtopic. IIIa. If really skilled, one side constructs the articles for all possible aspects and subtopics ahead of time & hopes to win on all fronts
There's a new version of Ia. if one loses at dispute resolution. Let the other side make a page to its liking, and try to delete it. Repeat every few months until success.
All the above are in technical conformity to the rules
On 1/16/07, Andre Engels andreengels@gmail.com wrote:
It's very nice in Wikipedia to work with consensus. But what if no consensus is found? How is it decided then?
-- Andre Engels, andreengels@gmail.com ICQ: 6260644 -- Skype: a_engels _______________________________________________ Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l