On 4/12/07, Erica fangaili@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/04/07, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote:
Non-notability is not a reason for speedy deletion, only non-assertion of notability. There is very little room for systemic bias with CSD A7. An article about a notable person that does not assert that notability can be speedy deleted (the admin can't know they are
--
On 4/12/07, Frederick Noronha fred@bytesforall.org wrote:
Well, I don't think so. Just to continue on this example, there are 732 links for Google for this group, and some time back we were saying that a presence in cyberspace is one of the factors on which notability could be determined. Anyone who checked the entry would have probably noticed this link which was put up originally itself:
http://www.google.co.in/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=com.ubuntu...
FN
Honestly, it's not the admin's job to google everything. If the article creator doesn't specify a notiablity assertion, it's an A7 candidate.
Which I think is a crap policy, frankly.