David Gerard wrote:
On 17/10/06, Platonides Platonides@gmail.com wrote:
Although gmaxwell will eat me, yes. GFDL is _viral_ too. The bigger trick of GFDL and which may make some parties to still pay for it is that you need to include a copy of the GFDL (several pages). If it hasn't other license, they must contact you (and get an agreement) to use it without such terms.
Yes. For using images in print, the GFDL is pretty much a pretend free content license, as the terms are ridiculously onerous in practice.
Insert my favourite cartoon here:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:BD-propagande_colour_en.jpg