There is a difference between a true encyclopedia and a book for children.
Can you imagine a book where attacks against indians were perpetrated by a detachment of the british army during the french and indian war under the command or none other than George Washington (he fought that war, that wasn't a pretty war--none are), and then the next paragraph exhalts the same man as the Father of our Country?
(I am not stating this is a fact, just saying that if in the future such example came to light, I would put it in wikipedia)
This would have absolutely nothing to do with porn and sensitivities, but I bet you there would be 100,000,000 people calling for the FBI, the CIA, and the Office of Homeland Security (if it ever sees the light of day) to shut down the server, arrest all involved, and charge them with sedition. We are at war, remember, and there are people in US jails who have been denied due process because of the color of their skin, origin, and/or religion. I wouldn't put it past the Ashcroft Posse.
So the encyclopedia should have a big fat disclaimer on top: "This is intended for a mature audience" (let the reader, based on their culture and jurisdiction decide what mature is to them), and let it be at that.
The girl holding the pussy and asking the question can go under "eroticism: the power of suggestion".
===== Christopher Mahan chris_mahan@yahoo.com http://www.christophermahan.com/
__________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? U2 on LAUNCH - Exclusive greatest hits videos http://launch.yahoo.com/u2