David Gerard wrote:
Faraaz Damji (frazzydee@spymac.com) [050414 08:08]:
I don't think that there will be dedicated editors like there are on Wikipedia, and like there were on Nupedia, since encarta is completely for profit- they're in it for the money and NOT for providing free access to "the sum of all human knowledge." There might be some casual editors who, upon finding something that wasn't previously there, will submit it (eg. if somebody died). There is little reason I see for anybody going on the site for the purpose of improving it.
It might keep the POV-pushers occupied. Then maybe they'll bother us less. (I can only hope.)
[[Template:Encarta]] (to be placed on User_talk: pages)
Dear contributor,
Wikipedia is a two-bit piece of &@!#. Nobody reads it. Since you know *the truth* about {{{1}}}, please stop wasting your time here. Try [[Encarta Wiki]] instead. Thanks, ~~~~
Oh, and:
[[Template:Uncyclopedia]] (to be placed on User_talk: pages)
Dear contributor,
Since Wikipedians are far too stupid to understand the breeding habits of dust bunnies, I suggest you try [[Uncyclopedia]] instead. The editors there will be a lot more receptive to your vast wealth of knowledge. Thanks, ~~~~