--- Anthere anthere9@yahoo.com schrieb:
I consider the board is not here to micromanage things and that natural leaders or natural groups of decision makers should appear to make the final decision on whether to open a new language or not.
[...]
But once a project has be agreed upon, I do not see the decision of opening one language or not being the job of board members, EXCEPT for decision such as whether to work in real languages only, or to accept constructed languages, because again, it might be a strategic decision. My opinion on the matter is simply that languages such as Klington are not welcome. And it seems the other board members agree with this.
This surely sounds sensible. A decision not to allow constructed languages anymore could certainly be regarded as a strategic decision. Since the board seems to be unanimous on this matter and the issue keeps on coming up again and again - causing unproductive strife each time - wouldn't it make sense if the board turned this attitude into an official policy?
Thus, the community would be disburdened from a controversial issue that obviously is not really solvable here and concentrate on making the existing Wikipedias work and starting successful new ones.
Arbeo
___________________________________________________________ Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 1GB Speicher kostenlos - Hier anmelden: http://mail.yahoo.de