Hi,
The only risk is censorship at search engine level. If Google starts putting Knol entries higher in its searches an important percent of our traffic moves to Knol.
Yet it's a risky move for Google itself. Knol is basically a Wikia, and wikia, while being a successful site, is well beyond wikipedia as public image, in terms of content credibility.
If Google starts to serve less authoritative content, it won't be long before people starts to use another engine, that surely will not positively bias knol content, but will rather do the opposite in order to exploit this weakness in Google's offer.
Many people start their searches "directly" from en.wiki already. So in the end Knol (while seemingly a powerful attack to our borders) may end up in delivering us a powerful share of Google's traffic.
I will be much more impressed the day Google tunnels OUR existing pages; it gives prominence to the tunneled version and pastes ads on them. That would do the trick, if their servers were quicker than ours and they could offer added services (say an integrated autosearch on YouTube, semantic searches, plus this, that and that... some of their tools already go in that direction and are far more dangerous than Knol). Screens are getting larger and larger and so is bandwidth, there is room on them to deliver more content offer. When it's not US doing it, somebody else will.
Yet as long as knol needs to fill in a 2 million pages startup gap based on nothing more than "earn 5 dollars a year by writing on your fav subject"... no, no need to worry. I'm copying it from citizendium's home page as I write: "We have added over 4,200 articles (and many subpages) since November 2006". Say Knol may do 100 times better in quantity by delivering worst quality. So what?
They ain't going nowhere... one thing is taking possession of a desert and apparently worthless market niche, as the WMF did, another is making your way thru an hyper saturated market. Google IS big, it has lots of control, but it doesn't have enough control on the market for them to take over like this. They need a better idea if they want to kick us out.
Berto 'd Sera Personagi dl'ann 2006 per l'arvista american-a Time (tanme tuti vojaotri) http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1569514,00.html
-----Original Message----- From: wikipedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:wikipedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Ronald Chmara Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2007 2:22 AM To: fredbaud@fairpoint.net; wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Wikipedia-l] Knol
On Dec 14, 2007, at 5:51 PM, Fred Bauder wrote:
Not only can adverts be purchased next to the results for these topics, but if Google is the number one result, which they will be (they emphasize in the blog post that "we are quite experienced with ranking web pages"), they also get to show advertisements next to the result that is clicked on in the event that the advertisement shown next to that result is not clicked on. This is an increase in impressions, and the larger the number of impressions, the greater the chance that one of them will be converted. Even better for Google is when a surfer clicks an advertisement in a Knol article which lands them on a page displaying Google ads, which.... you see where this is going...:)
That's what happens when you leave 10 billion dollars laying on the table. Someone will pick it up. And, in our case, everyone will. However, those who have picked up may also give back.
So, Google knol is somewhat like wikipedia, with each new "revision" of an article having advertisements customized for that revision?
I can't wait to see how their "herbal viagra" knol cluster turns out, or which version of the "George W. Bush" knol gets the highest rank... somehow, I don't see this ending well, without major changes.
Without clear guidelines, group ownership of "a good knol", and smart- mob rule (as with wikipedia), it seems like a one-way ticket into becoming, well, a morass of plagiarism accusations, highly biased articles in competition with each other, and rampant abuse.
For us (and by "us", I mean the folks who have watched and worked in similar projects over the years), I suspect watching knol will be an experience not unlike watching one's own child learn to become a parent.
{{citation needed}} pretty much says it all.
-Bop
_______________________________________________ Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l