Giskart wrote:
''It seems clear to my that the English Wikipedia is not willing to give up his prominend location at www.wikipedia.org.''
Is that true? I read declarations in the past that said otherwise, but actions seems to indicate that he is right. There has been discussion here and on meta, but the results are always in the future.
Questions:
Is there any technical reason that www.wikipedia.org can not have one content, while www.wikipedia.org/wiki/something and www.wikipedia.org/wiki/something point to en.wikipedia.org/wiki/something?
Who has the final word in the "political" decision (as opposed to technical)? Jimbo? I remember him telling that he agreed to the change. Did he change his mind?
I'm sorry to insist in what may appear to be a petty issue, but I do not think it is.
--AstroNomer
__________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com