Hoi, The situation is deadlocked when everything centers around single persons. When you want to put it like that there is a crisis, it is however a personal crisis staged for everyone to see.
I do subscribe to the idea that it would be best for you to stay if you want to. You have been a valuable contributor and you have been a valuable vandalfighter. However, given the way you threw your weight around, I do think it best when you do not force issues in the way you have done. It is a distraction and it only makes the things you want to achieve become secondary issues. It is telling that the things that you want to see happen BECAME secondary because of the strategies that you employ. This is not the first time that it happened.
You mean well, but the way you do things is detrimental for long term cooperation.
Thanks, GerardM
On 1/18/06, Walter van Kalken walter@vankalken.net wrote:
Tjipke de Vries wrote:
Andre Engels wrote:
Nevertheless, I think there IS a crisis on the Dutch Wikipedia that might require intervention.
What kind of intervention do you suggest?
Tjipke de Vries
I do not think Andre has an answer to that. Neither have I. The situation is deadlocked at the moment. People are urging me by mail to stay. Another group would not have that. No one knows what to do. At the moment we have all lost.
Waerth/Walter _______________________________________________ Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l