On 11/11/02 2:52 PM, "Tucci" tucci528@yahoo.com wrote:
Tokerboy :Ed Poor
I originally only wanted to respond to two posts. First of all, I like the Cunctster being a prick--he's a vaccine against groupthink because no decision will ever be unanimous as long as he is here--makes me wonder if that's his goal. Many CEOs and team leaders and the like secretly designate one board/team member to disagree on every decision, because otherwise groups tend to accept the first even remotely viable option presented.
Oh, I've agreed with many a decision. My goal is not to disagree with every decision, just to discourage mistakes.
I don't think freezing pages is the right way to deal with edit conflicts.
I think the right thing to do would be to carefully go over the case history and look at specific examples of where people feel the system has broken down.