[ Mark writes ]
You think that you can claim that just because I am not a Serbian, I know nothing about this issue. Well, I have seen images of Zlatibor on television, and I read all about the Serbian occupation. I have a bumper sticker that says "Free Zlatibor Now! Boycott Serbia!", and I own some books on Zlatiborian language. My deepest hope is that after the Serbian tyranny ends, I may travel to Zlatibor and witness the beauty firsthand.
Boy, I would give an eyetooth for one of those bumper stickers. Trade you for a pair of "Zapatistas of the world, untie!" shoe decals...
As long as rants about language acceptance are benig exchanged, here's something that has been bothering me lately:
It has been suggested more than once that we should get professional linguists / a small group of Wiki[m]edians to determine what new languages are 'proper' or acceptable, before asking the community to discuss and reach consensus. But should Wikimedia be making decisions about the officialness of languages at all? It seems to me we can neutrally defer this to a higher authority*.
The ISO handles ISO 639-1 and -2 reasonably well; these are standards designed to identify written documents, and to include those languages 'most frequently represented in the total body of the world's literature' -- which seems appropriate. I put some specific information on meta: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/ISO_criteria_for_defining_new_languages
If you think we can do better than the ISO, please comment on that talk page**...
SJ
* "Wikipedia includes 74 major and 7 minor[1] languages with over 1000 articles. ... [1] 'Major' languages are defined as those with two-letter ISO 639-1 codes, a set of languages considered to be most frequently represented in world literature."
** Perhaps we can have a standard procedure that assumes an ISO-2 code language, and provide for exceptions. Some current non-ISO wikipedia languages, illustrating various reasons different users might have not to stick blindly to such a standard : - zh_min_nan (1,200 articles; listed in places as "taiwanese") , - tpi (tok pisin, recent conlang, 160 articles), - fiu_vro (Võro, 105 articles & activity), - roa_rup (Aromanian; 29 articles & little activity, but just got ISO 639-2 approval for "rup" in September). + Current well-received /proposals/ for non-ISO languages include pdc (Pennsylvania dutch), which already has a 500-article site independent of Wikimedia).