Daniel Mayer wrote:
Delirium wrote:
I'm not entirely sure one of those points is necessary: the statement that the article was retrieved from Wikipedia.
Well, that is what the printable page says. So what if it goes over the bounds of what what is minimally needed for GNU FDL compliance? Another purpose of the message is for citation purposes. In those cases the name of the source and when the article was last edited are needed.
Oh, it's certainly a good idea, and doesn't hurt anything, to mention Wikipedia as the source. But we can't *require* people to do so, and write them nasty letters if they don't, unless it actually is a legal requirement, which I don't think it is.
-Mark