On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 02:12:50PM -0500, Poor, Edmund W wrote:
We need a flame-free, no-nonsense haven for discussion of Wikipedia.
Julie said some things about Erik's behavior that needed to be said. They may not have been pleasant things, but they did not constitute a flame either.
Neither did my detailing of RK's behavior constitute a flame; it was a factual appeal to the list for help in dealing with something destructive to the community.
Since you have said you wouldn't have forwarded those messages, I see that we disagree on the definition of a "flame". I am against flaming. But we need a place to put forward the facts when coming to a group concensus about a persons behavior.
Jonathan