Tom Parmenter wrote:
Why not wait until we have 120,000 articles and then announce that we have 100,000?
it's twisted... I like it
I like the "we are working on 89,375 articles". I do not share the disdain for stubs, any more than I disdain a bud on a rose bush,
Indeed. stubbishness is in the eye of the beholder. A biography might still be called a stub at a couple of pages.