From: Angela beesley@gmail.com
He seems to implying the main differences are in pronunciation:
"Zlatiborian uses the Ijekavian pronounce, while Serbian uses the Ekavian. [...] Most of Zlatiborian words are differently stressed than Serbian.
This isn't relevant to Wikipedia since it's only written, not spoken. Where projects are moving towards spoken versions ([[meta:Wikisound]]), there's no reason to not record multiple versions with different pronunciations.
You can write any difference in pronunciation, except the really minor ones. How big are the differences? Are the dialect groups mutually intelligible? Are the differences comparable with English proper and London dialect? English and Scots? Spanish and Portuguese? We must know that to judge whether or not this Zlatiborian can get a Wikipedia on its own.
Wouter
_________________________________________________________________ MSN Webmessenger doet het altijd en overal http://webmessenger.msn.com/