As further addition:
1. Waerth's warning to people who had voted in favor of the proposal to lengthen discussion time consisted of the standard warning template for vandals, with the following text added (translation mine):
Through your behavior in this poll you show that you don't give a damn about wikipedia. And see wikipedia as something it is not. Namely a discussion forum. This kind of actions is dangerous for the future of wikipedia and contrary to her purposes and borders to trolling behaviour: you deliberately block progress on a subject about which has been discussed over a year. If you see wikipedia as a discussion forum and keep frustrating each form of progress on wikipedia I will have to ask you friendly to look for another place like one of the millions of discussion forums on the net. If you are a moderator then you have acted so much against all regulations and guidelines that I will start a desysopping procedure, which hereby has been announced the necessary 48 houirs in advance. Removing this warning will lead to a blocking for an indetermined period of time.
2. Singlehandedly deblocking is apparently considered a quite serious crime for Dutch sysops. I do not agree, which is one of the reasons I did not want to remain a sysop (others are serious disagreements on blocking length, requirements and statements which seem to indicate that sysops are worth more than other users and my own inflammability)
Nevertheless, I think there IS a crisis on the Dutch Wikipedia that might require intervention. Only 2 months ago Londenp and I both resigned after a heavy conflict on the subject of unblocking. And Errabee has announced a wish to resign too. Adding all together, even with Waerth and Errabee still be sysops, the Dutch Wikipedia has less than 1/10 the number of sysops from the English one (64 against 792) but half as many who resigned or were forced to step down (12 against 23).
-- Andre Engels, andreengels@gmail.com ICQ: 6260644 -- Skype: a_engels