Hi,
interesting -- but are you sure you get all the votes? AFAIK, I did vote (till we *) or Tillwe), but Inpage-Search didn't find me in your data sheet.
Regards,
Till
-- Original Nachricht -- To: wikipedia-l@wikipedia.org From: Rob Lanphier robla@robla.net Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 20:08:16 -0700 Cc: Subject: [Wikipedia-l] Logo results as tallied pairwise (Condorcet) Reply-To: wikipedia-l@Wikipedia.org
As both a check on the election results, and as a demonstration of pairwise voting, I decided to do the following:
* Download the ballots cast in this contest * Run them through a program I wrote to parse them into a formatI'm used to working with (with candidate translation list I manually created). * Tally the votes using the Condorcet calculator
In using this technique, the winner of this election remains the same (1a). However, it's still interesting to see the nature of the pairwise
matchups. In particular, the race for second place was really close (option 2c beat option 10 by five votes). It was even closer before I
noticed I missed the international ballots (without those ballots, 10 beat 2c by a vote).
You can see the complete results here: http://www.electorama.com/2003/wplogo-pairwise/
Rob
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
________________________________________ Digitale Urlaubsfotos online speichern und Abzüge bestellen bei http://www.epost.de