On 29/03/07, Monk monkbel@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I imagine though that your complaints about it being read-only will not be listened to by anybody at all -- I was similarly upset about teh Moldavian Wikipedia, but it remains read-only.
The problem is, that Moldavian Wikipedia didn't have enough contributors and content, and was put read-only just because it was filled with spam; Belarusian wikipedia has large number of active contributors.
It had more contributors and content than does the Afar Wikipedia (aa.wp)...
And where is this spam? I never saw such things.
But now we have only politically-rigged wikipedia in active state, but actual Belarusian wikipedia is frozen. I don't feel it to be right. First of all wikipedia which is about knowledge should be put in work; and I am not sure that wikipedia that is about politics (current be.wiki) should work under WMF logo.
Well, according to the other side, it is your Wikipedia which was politically rigged. Theirs is written in the official variety, the one taught in schools. I do understand that it can be seen as a support of the current government, but I don't see how your version is any _less_ "politically rigged". If anything, it seems to be much moreso.