I think Lars means the copy and paste of information without student's process. But this is done with othe online material as well. Again, as Thomas says, it is in the details how it is done. Wikipedia is an important source for learning if this is the task of people who use it as a free source of serious information. Rodolfo
Thomas Dalton wrote:
2009/9/29 Lars Aronsson lars@aronsson.se:
This weekend I learned about the phrase "Wikipedia education". Apparently it is used in Swedish ("Wikipedia-undervisning") to describe the kind of teacher-less lessons where school kids are left to "research" a topic on their own. Typically they google and find facts in Wikipedia, which they copy to their papers. The phrase does not say anything about Wikipedia in itself, but describes an irresponsible attitude from some teachers. The sad effect is that Wikipedia's name is associated with something bad.
How could we turn this around, so Wikipedia is associated with serious knowledge and good education?
What you describe isn't necessarily a bad thing. Independent learning and research is a very important part of education. It all comes down to the details of how it is done.
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l