--- lcrocker@nupedia.com wrote:
But again, I think it needs to develop in a centralized way for a while before risking that. I may be labelled a heretic for saying this, but part of what make Wikipedia great is its /lack/ or freedom and universal participation. Everything2 showed us what that devolves into. We have a central goal here--a narrow focus, and people to keep the masses pointed in the right direction.
Yeah, I think that's kind of heretical. But you write good articles *and* software, so I'll engage in some religious tolerance. :)
Has anyone ever surfed around H2G2.com? Its entries seem to be of consistantly better quality than most of Everything2, and they have a peer-review system in place. I'm going to poke around there a bit and see if they have any useful techniques that could be adapted to Wikipedia. Fishing out a few new Wikipedians wouldn't hurt either.
Stephen G.
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs http://www.hotjobs.com