Kurt Jansson wrote:
Jimmy Wales wrote:
While I'm sympathetic to the cause, I'm not really comfortable with Wikipedia per se taking part in a political act just because I (and presumably a majority of wikipedians) happen to agree with it.
Of course not. Wikipedia should take part because software patents could have direct effects on the project. They threaten free software (like MediaWiki) in general, and I wouldn't be surprised if someone claimed to have a patent on "websites which are editable by visitors" (of course formulated much more eloquently).
On this issue I think free Wiki's may actually be the first to utilize the concept, which would make it not a problem for us.
In any case, starting to take political stands gets a bit murky. Perhaps since we're a GFDL encyclopedia, some of us see copyrights as being detrimental to our work, since we cannot freely integrate material from copyrighted sources. But should we therefore lobby for the abolition of copyrights? Some would say yes, but many would say no. I think we should basically stay out of all these political disputes as much as possible, and let the individual contributors make whatever personal political stands they want to. Having Wikipedia make official stands is only going to alienate contributors who disagree with those stands. I would think people who support software patents are still welcome to write articles on Wikipedia, but if Wikipedia starts taking such stands they may feel unwelcome here.
-Mark