<unl>[s:1]obj(work(agt>thing,obj>thing):07.@entry.@present, UNL(icl>thing):15.@def) agt(work(agt>thing,obj>thing):07.@entry.@present, I:00)[/s]</unl>
Mark
On 18/06/05, Guaka guaka@no-log.org wrote:
On Sat, 2005-06-18 at 02:20 -0400, James R. Johnson wrote:
Also, if you do it for Wiktionary, it would only be logical to merge all wikipedias into the Ultimate Wikipedia, Ultimate Wikiquote, Ultimate Wikibooks, etc. But that's simply for consistency's sake.
There's a difference huge between a collection of words and a collection of lists of phrases.
It would make sense to create an Ultimate Wikipedia when we'll be able to create the Ultimate Pivot Language, possibly using the Ultimate Wiktionary. If meaning, syntax and all these things are clearly seperated in our UW it could guide to the creation of an artificial language that does sufficiently well in serving as the thing stuff like Universal Networking Language (tm) is supposed to do.
Wikipedia: In machine translation, '''Universal Networking Language''' is an artificial pivot language, that requires semi-automated translation from the initial text into its pivot equivalent, but allows automated translation from documents expressed in the pivot language into virtually any language.
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l