On Jan 19, 2004, at 2:12 PM, Ramanan Selvaratnam wrote:
On Thu, 1970-01-01 at 05:59, Peter Jaros wrote: ^^^^^^^^^^ Birth of Unix :)?
Accident with a contraceptive and a time machine. Long story.
On Jan 15, 2004, at 6:32 PM, Jimmy Wales wrote:
To me, that should actually generate demand for a GNU-free alternative, right? People can trust that it's not doing anything evil, because the source is publicly available.
Unfortunately, most people in the toolbar market don't care.
I was amazed to find out (while getting some proper definitions by the way) how much people who care about software futures are worried by current practices.
They generally might not know the exact specifics of how source code is compiled etc. but it is abundantly clear that the proprietary players are pushing black boxes and that too along the ugliest global divides like economic wealth to further such division. That includes support for oppressive practices.
Well. I'm impressed and duly corrected.
BTW, this isn't to say open source isn't worth it in this effort. It's mainly just a rant about, well, whatever you call the uninformed masses of the computer world.
Windows users?
I do not fully understand what is said here but I disagree:) MS-Windows user however conned out of the bottoms they might be ... they cannot be written off.
Sorry. Don't mind me, it was just an attempt at humor, and a poor one at that.
Broadcasting from the present once again, Peter
--- Funding for this program comes from Borders without Doctors: The Bookstore Chain That Sounds Like a Charity. --Harry Shearer, Le Show