Spending all this money on changing the law in the USA is imho largely a waste of money.
And resources. I contribute to the Wiki to help provide an alternative to the marketingspeak and lawyer-writen short-term memory that forms a surprising amount of the 'web. Political lobbying is the sort of thing I come to the wiki to avoid.
I still think everyone is much too focused on "big content". I'm much more concerned about the huge amount of non-commercial content that gets stamped with a copyright without the author having any idea of how that works. I have posted on this before, and the answers were always "well that's what CC is for". True as that may be, no-one's ever heard of it. _I_ never heard of it until coming to the wiki.
Consider the millions of snapshots that are taken every week and posted on the 'net. One or two of them would improve the wiki, I'm sure, but we can't use them. Not because the snapshot-taker has any intension of making money, but because it was copyrighted "by default" and they are completely unaware of it. This has happened to me repeatedly when trying to get images for articles. And contrary to the claims here, most librarians and archivists are completely unaware of either the problem or the solutions.
So I still think education would be a good use of these funds. Who cares about the big media houses when there is so much content out there that's free but shackled? Let's try to fix THAT problem, lets make sure people know there is a better way.
Maury
_________________________________________________________________ Experience Live Search from your PC or mobile device today. http://www.live.com/?mkt=en-ca