On Monday 22 July 2002 04:04 pm, you wrote on sourceforge:
Initial Comment: I don't really like the new recent changes page, with each change (even of the same article) showing up as one row. It's cluttering the page, and makes it more difficult to track the changes for me.
J. Heijmans
I agree tottally -- it is no longer possible for me to review all changes made in the 12 to 18 hour a day stretches of time when I'm not on wikipedia at all. I knew this would happen eventually as more and more contributors made more and more contributions each day but I wasn't prepared to drastically change the way I contribute just yet (thank goodness for the Watch List).
I for one didn't have any problem with the the previous layout of Recent Changes -- next to each diff was a short statement of the number of changes made to that page during the period selected (last 100, 500.. edits or last 14, 30.. days). All that was needed was a quick check of the the history (which was also linked from the entry in Recent Changes) to see all the activity that has occurred with that article. Now when I leave my computer to eat dinner and come back in an hour I am greeted with four to five times the number of entries as before. I really don't care if it took user X 15 edits to bring an article to their liking and all those entries in Recent Changes really does clutter the page.
It furthermore doesn't make any sense to have an active link to the most current diff next too an entry in Recent Changes that is 3 or 4 times removed from being the most recent change to /that/ article. This will only lead to misunderstandings as to who has done what among newbies (and headaches for may old timers). At the very least, only the most recent change to each article should have an active diff link.
Wikiware gurus, please bring back the option for users to turn off the display of each and every single edit made to one particular article (in the same way we are now able to turn off the display of minor edits). I really do prefer the executive summary format of before.
PS - Was I the only one who used the table format for displaying Recent Changes before? I really don't care for the standard display which doesn't organize user names and comments in columns... For me, this is another thing that makes reading the new Recent Changes more difficult.
--maveric149