It is a policy issue when I try to do something, I explain *why* I do it on Brion page, and in the comment box,
Why am I supposed to be reading Brion's talk page to figure out what you were doing on a completely different page? That is silly.
..... What I did (but left unfinished for it took me quite some time just to do that, and even adding something on the talk page would have taken about 10 mn to avoid getting things messed) was utterly discarded and labelled destruction by you, and is now unrecoverable.
? I did a backwards merge - it took me 7 minutes. However, when I first saw your changes along with destruction your browser caused, I didn't have 5 minutes or the urge to fix the mess your browser caused AND recreate your edits. Why should I be responsible for that anyway?
I consider having many different propositions done on the same page is useless, they could be on separate pages. That whole page is a total mess, and it is very hard to see the different arguments. All the arguments are not even there. Nobody is doing the job. I tried to start it. And it was dismissed as inopportune. Without consideration.
When edits are reverted without consideration, that's a policy issue.
I considered your changes - and I disagreed with them. Especially the part where your browser /destroyed/ the page. Hence this is a technical issue.
--mav
WikiKarma I updated all the year pages and most of the other pages liked from http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/January_17