On 7/28/02 1:24 PM, "Hr. Daniel Mikkelsen" daniel@copyleft.no wrote:
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Fred Bauder wrote:
I guess I see the use of [[controverial issue]] a bit differently. If either from experience here or elsewhere you know the issue is one on which there are passionate differences the link should be in the first paragraph, with information on the page [[controversial issue]] giving what ever aid we can to readers and writers.
So how about calling it the "NPOV dispute flag" instead. :) Goes down better?
It's still a bad idea if it's something that people check off. It's not necessarily a bad idea if you can find some objective metric that achieves a similar purpose automatically. See if you can think of measurable criteria which would discern such articles.