Although it doesn't make for much of a statistical difference, at least not in rank, I feel I should note that you are inaccurately comparing the number of inhabitants of a country with articles, rather than the number of speakers of a language. For many languages, there is a huge population abroad, and that might make a significant difference.
Mark
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 02:33:36 +0100, Lars Alvik larsal@stud.ntnu.no wrote:
På 11. mar. 2005 kl. 00:28 skrev Mark Williamson:
Currently, IIRC our greatest article-to-speaker proportion is for Faroese. This is a bit sad since the Faroese Wikipedia doesn't even have 200 articles, but if I recall correctly it is the truth (surely Welsh and Basque are somewhere nearby in this proportion).
Acually, after a couple of minutes of research i found the the wikipedia with best article pr. speaker ratio. Iceland, with 7 articles pr 1000 inhabitant. Followed closely by no, dk and fi with around 4 articles pr. 1000 inhabitant
And then follows faroese with around 3 articles pr inhabitant.
mvh. Lars Alvik _______________________________________________ Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l